Previous Page | Page 62 | Next Page |
AIM
4/3/14
1−1−30
Navigation Aids
course even though it is on an acceptable intercept
heading. Referencing the digital track displacement
information (cross track error), if it is available in the
approach mode, may help the pilot remain position
oriented in this situation. Being established on the
final approach course prior to the beginning of the
sensitivity change at 2 NM will help prevent
problems in interpreting the CDI display during ramp
down. Therefore, requesting or accepting vectors
which will cause the aircraft to intercept the final
approach course within 2 NM of the FAWP is not
recommended.
6.
When receiving vectors to final, most
receiver operating manuals suggest placing the
receiver in the nonsequencing mode on the FAWP
and manually setting the course. This provides an
extended final approach course in cases where the
aircraft is vectored onto the final approach course
outside of any existing segment which is aligned with
the runway. Assigned altitudes must be maintained
until established on a published segment of the
approach. Required altitudes at waypoints outside the
FAWP or stepdown fixes must be considered.
Calculating the distance to the FAWP may be
required in order to descend at the proper location.
7.
Overriding an automatically selected sensit-
ivity during an approach will cancel the approach
mode annunciation. If the approach mode is not
armed by 2 NM prior to the FAWP, the approach
mode will not become active at 2 NM prior to the
FAWP, and the equipment will flag. In these
conditions, the RAIM and CDI sensitivity will not
ramp down, and the pilot should not descend to MDA,
but fly to the MAWP and execute a missed approach.
The approach active annunciator and/or the receiver
should be checked to ensure the approach mode is
active prior to the FAWP.
8.
Do not attempt to fly an approach unless the
procedure in the on−board database is current and
identified as “GPS” on the approach chart. The
navigation database may contain information about
nonoverlay approach procedures that is intended to
be used to enhance position orientation, generally by
providing a map, while flying these approaches using
conventional NAVAIDs. This approach information
should not be confused with a GPS overlay approach
(see the receiver operating manual, AFM, or AFM
Supplement for details on how to identify these
procedures in the navigation database). Flying point
to point on the approach does not assure compliance
with the published approach procedure. The proper
RAIM sensitivity will not be available and the CDI
sensitivity will not automatically change to
±0.3 NM. Manually setting CDI sensitivity does not
automatically change the RAIM sensitivity on some
receivers. Some existing nonprecision approach
procedures cannot be coded for use with GPS and will
not be available as overlays.
9.
Pilots should pay particular attention to the
exact operation of their GPS receivers for performing
holding patterns and in the case of overlay
approaches, operations such as procedure turns.
These procedures may require manual intervention
by the pilot to stop the sequencing of waypoints by the
receiver and to resume automatic GPS navigation
sequencing once the maneuver is complete. The same
waypoint may appear in the route of flight more than
once consecutively (e.g., IAWP, FAWP, MAHWP on
a procedure turn). Care must be exercised to ensure
that the receiver is sequenced to the appropriate
waypoint for the segment of the procedure being
flown, especially if one or more fly−overs are skipped
(e.g., FAWP rather than IAWP if the procedure turn
is not flown). The pilot may have to sequence past one
or more fly−overs of the same waypoint in order to
start GPS automatic sequencing at the proper place in
the sequence of waypoints.
10.
Incorrect inputs into the GPS receiver are
especially critical during approaches. In some cases,
an incorrect entry can cause the receiver to leave the
approach mode.
11. A fix on an overlay approach identified by a
DME fix will not be in the waypoint sequence on the
GPS receiver unless there is a published name
assigned to it. When a name is assigned, the along
track to the waypoint may be zero rather than the
DME stated on the approach chart. The pilot should
be alert for this on any overlay procedure where the
original approach used DME.
12.
If a visual descent point (VDP) is published,
it will not be included in the sequence of waypoints.
Pilots are expected to use normal piloting techniques
for beginning the visual descent, such as ATD.
13.
Unnamed stepdown fixes in the final
approach segment will not be coded in the waypoint
sequence of the aircraft’s navigation database and
must be identified using ATD. Stepdown fixes in the
final approach segment of RNAV (GPS) approaches
Previous Page | Page 62 | Next Page |