75
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 13.231
judge at or before the time specified in
the subpoena for compliance. The ap-
plicant shall describe, in detail, the
basis for the application to quash or
modify the supoena including, but not
limited to, a statement that the testi-
mony, document, or tangible evidence
is not relevant to the proceeding, that
the subpoena is not reasonably tailored
to the scope of the proceeding, or that
the subpoena is unreasonable and op-
pressive. A motion to quash or modify
the subpoena will stay the effect of the
subpoena pending a decision by the ad-
ministrative law judge on the motion.
(c)
Enforcement of subpoena.
Upon a
showing that a person has failed or re-
fused to comply with a subpoena, a
party may apply to the local federal
district court to seek judicial enforce-
ment of the subpoena in accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 46104 in cases under the
Federal aviation statute.
[Amdt. 13–21, 55 FR 27575, July 3, 1990, as
amended at 71 FR 70465, Dec. 5, 2006]
§ 13.229
Witness fees.
(a)
General.
Unless otherwise author-
ized by the administrative law judge,
the party who applies for a subpoena to
compel the attendance of a witness at
a deposition or hearing, or the party at
whose request a witness appears at a
deposition or hearing, shall pay the
witness fees described in this section.
(b)
Amount.
Except for an employee
of the agency who appears at the direc-
tion of the agency, a witness who ap-
pears at a deposition or hearing is enti-
tled to the same fees and mileage ex-
penses as are paid to a witness in a
court of the United States in com-
parable circumstances.
§ 13.230
Record.
(a)
Exclusive record.
The transcript of
all testimony in the hearing, all exhib-
its received into evidence, and all mo-
tions, applications, requests, and rul-
ings shall constitute the exclusive
record for decision of the proceedings
and the basis for the issuance of any
orders in the proceeding. Any pro-
ceedings regarding the disqualification
of an administrative law judge shall be
included in the record.
(b)
Examination and copying of record.
Any person may examine the record at
the Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation
Administration, 600 Independence Ave-
nue, SW., Wilbur Wright Building—
Room 2014, Washington, DC 20591. Doc-
uments may also be examined and cop-
ied at the U.S. Department of Trans-
portation, Docket Operations, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Wash-
ington, DC 20590. Any person may have
a copy of the record after payment of
reasonable costs to copy the record.
[Doc. No. 18884, 44 FR 63723, Nov. 5, 1979, as
amended at 70 FR 8238, Feb. 18, 2005; 72 FR
68474, Dec. 5, 2007]
§ 13.231
Argument before the adminis-
trative law judge.
(a)
Arguments during the hearing.
Dur-
ing the hearing, the administrative law
judge shall give the parties a reason-
able opportunity to present arguments
on the record supporting or opposing
motions, objections, and rulings if the
parties request an opportunity for ar-
gument. The administrative law judge
may request written arguments during
the hearing if the administrative law
judge finds that submission of written
arguments would be reasonable.
(b)
Final oral argument.
At the conclu-
sion of the hearing and before the ad-
ministrative law judge issues an initial
decision in the proceedings, the parties
are entitled to submit oral proposed
findings of fact and conclusions of law,
exceptions to rulings of the adminis-
trative law judge, and supporting argu-
ments for the findings, conclusions, or
exceptions. At the conclusion of the
hearing, a party may waive final oral
argument.
(c)
Posthearing briefs.
The administra-
tive law judge may request written
posthearing briefs before the adminis-
trative law judge issues an initial deci-
sion in the proceedings if the adminis-
trative law judge finds that submission
of written arguments would be reason-
able. If a party files a written
posthearing brief, the party shall in-
clude proposed findings of fact and con-
clusions of law, exceptions to rulings of
the administrative law judge, and sup-
porting arguments for the findings,
conclusions, or exceptions. The admin-
istrative law judge shall give the par-
ties a reasonable opportunity, not
more than 30 days after receipt of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:50 Apr 30, 2019
Jkt 247046
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8010
Y:\SGML\247046.XXX
247046
spaschal on DSK3GDR082PROD with CFR