background image

106 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–19 Edition) 

Pt. 60, App. A 

overshoots since the significance of such 
overshoots becomes questionable. Only those 
overshoots larger than 5 per cent of the total 
initial displacement should be considered. 
The residual band, labeled T(A

d

) on Figure 

A2A is 

±

5 percent of the initial displacement 

amplitude A

d

from the steady state value of 

the oscillation. Only oscillations outside the 
residual band are considered significant. 
When comparing FFS data to airplane data, 
the process should begin by overlaying or 
aligning the FFS and airplane steady state 
values and then comparing amplitudes of os-
cillation peaks, the time of the first zero 
crossing and individual periods of oscilla-
tion. The FFS should show the same number 
of significant overshoots to within one when 
compared against the airplane data. The pro-
cedure for evaluating the response is illus-
trated in Figure A2A. 

(b) Critically damped and overdamped re-

sponse. Due to the nature of critically 
damped and overdamped responses (no over-
shoots), the time to reach 90 percent of the 
steady state (neutral point) value should be 
the same as the airplane within 

±

10 percent. 

Figure A2B illustrates the procedure. 

(c) Special considerations. Control systems 

that exhibit characteristics other than clas-
sical overdamped or underdamped responses 
should meet specified tolerances. In addi-
tion, special consideration should be given to 
ensure that significant trends are main-
tained. 

(2) Tolerances. 
(a) The following table summarizes the tol-

erances, T, for underdamped systems, and 
‘‘n’’ is the sequential period of a full cycle of 
oscillation. See Figure A2A of this attach-
ment for an illustration of the referenced 
measurements. 

T(P

0

) ..........

±

10% of P

0

T(P

1

) ..........

±

20% of P

1

T(P

2

) ..........

±

30% of P

2

T(P

n

) ..........

±

10(n + 1)% of P

n

T(A

n

) ..........

±

10% of A

1

T(A

d

) ..........

±

5% of A

d

= residual 

band. 

Significant overshoots, First overshoot 

and 

±

1 subsequent overshoots. 

(b) The following tolerance applies to criti-

cally damped and overdamped systems only. 
See Figure A2B for an illustration of the ref-
erence measurements: 

T(P

0

) ..........

±

10% of P

0

 

E

ND

I

NFORMATION

 

lllllllllllllllllllllll

B

EGIN

QPS R

EQUIREMENT

 

c. Alternative method for control dynam-

ics evaluation. 

(1) An alternative means for validating 

control dynamics for aircraft with hydrau-
lically powered flight controls and artificial 
feel systems is by the measurement of con-
trol force and rate of movement. For each 
axis of pitch, roll, and yaw, the control must 
be forced to its maximum extreme position 
for the following distinct rates. These tests 
are conducted under normal flight and 
ground conditions. 

(a) Static test—Slowly move the control so 

that a full sweep is achieved within 95 to 105 
seconds. A full sweep is defined as movement 
of the controller from neutral to the stop, 
usually aft or right stop, then to the oppo-
site stop, then to the neutral position. 

(b) Slow dynamic test—Achieve a full 

sweep within 8–12 seconds. 

(c) Fast dynamic test—Achieve a full 

sweep within 3–5 seconds. 

N

OTE

: Dynamic sweeps may be limited to 

forces not exceeding 100 lbs. (44.5 daN). 

(d) Tolerances 
(i) Static test; see Table A2A, FFS Objec-

tive Tests, Entries 2.a.1., 2.a.2., and 2.a.3. 

(ii) Dynamic test—

±

2 lbs (0.9 daN) or 

±

10% 

on dynamic increment above static test. 

E

ND

QPS R

EQUIREMENT

 

lllllllllllllllllllllll

B

EGIN

I

NFORMATION

 

d. The FAA is open to alternative means 

such as the one described above. The alter-
natives should be justified and appropriate 
to the application. For example, the method 
described here may not apply to all manufac-
turers’ systems and certainly not to aircraft 
with reversible control systems. Each case is 
considered on its own merit on an ad hoc 
basis. If the FAA finds that alternative 
methods do not result in satisfactory per-
formance, more conventionally accepted 
methods will have to be used. 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

16:30 Jun 25, 2019

Jkt 247047

PO 00000

Frm 00116

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8002

Q:\14\14V2.TXT

PC31

kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB