Federal Aviation Administration, DOT

Pt. 60, App. A

a. Table A1A, General Requirements, Section
2.d.2. (Ground Reaction Characteristics)
b. Table A3A, Functions and Subjective Testing Requirements, test 9.e. (Missed Approach - Bounced Landing)
4. Where qualification is being sought to
conduct bounced landing training tasks in
accordance with this Directive, the FSTD
Sponsor must conduct the required evaluations and modifications as prescribed in this
Directive and report compliance to the
NSPM in accordance with Section 60.23 using the
NSP-s standardized FSTD Sponsor Notification Form. At a minimum, this form must be
accompanied with the following information:
a. A description of any modifications to the
FSTD (in accordance with Section 60.23) necessary
to meet the requirements of this Directive;
and
b. A confirmation statement that the modified FSTD has been subjectively evaluated
by a qualified pilot as described in
Section 60.16(a)(1)(iii).
5. The NSPM will review each submission
to determine if the requirements of this Directive have been met and respond to the
FSTD Sponsor as described in Section 60.23(c). Additional NSPM conducted FSTD evaluations
may be required before the modified FSTD is
placed into service. This response, along
with any noted restrictions, will serve as an
interim qualification for bounced landing recovery training tasks until such time that a
permanent change is made to the Statement
of Qualification (SOQ) at the FSTD-s next
scheduled evaluation.
ATTACHMENT 7 TO APPENDIX A TO PART 60 - 
ADDITIONAL SIMULATOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STALL, UPSET PREVENTION
AND RECOVERY, AND ENGINE AND AIRFRAME
ICING TRAINING TASKS
BEGIN QPS REQUIREMENTS

kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB

A. High Angle of Attack Model Evaluation
(Table A1A, Section 2.m.)
1. Applicability: This attachment applies
to all simulators that are used to satisfy
training requirements for stall maneuvers
that are conducted at angles of attack beyond the activation of the stall warning system. This attachment is not applicable for
those FSTDs that are only qualified for approach to stall maneuvers where recovery is
initiated at the first indication of the stall.
The material in this section is intended to
supplement the general requirements, objective testing requirements, and subjective
testing requirements contained within Tables A1A, A2A, and A3A, respectively.
2. General Requirements: The requirements for high angle of attack modeling are
intended to evaluate the recognition cues
and performance and handling qualities of a
developing stall through the stall identifica-

tion angle-of-attack and recovery. Strict
time-history-based
evaluations
against
flight test data may not adequately validate
the aerodynamic model in an unsteady and
potentially unstable flight regime, such as
stalled flight. As a result, the objective testing requirements defined in Table A2A do
not prescribe strict tolerances on any parameter at angles of attack beyond the stall
identification angle of attack. In lieu of
mandating such objective tolerances, a
Statement of Compliance (SOC) will be required to define the source data and methods
used to develop the stall aerodynamic model.
3. Fidelity Requirements: The requirements defined for the evaluation of full stall
training maneuvers are intended to provide
the following levels of fidelity:
a. Airplane type specific recognition cues of
the first indication of the stall (such as the
stall warning system or aerodynamic stall
buffet);
b. Airplane type specific recognition cues of
an impending aerodynamic stall; and
c. Recognition cues and handling qualities
from the stall break through recovery that
are sufficiently exemplar of the airplane
being simulated to allow successful completion of the stall recovery training tasks.
For the purposes of stall maneuver evaluation, the term  - exemplar -  is defined as a
level of fidelity that is type specific of the
simulated airplane to the extent that the
training objectives can be satisfactorily accomplished.
4. Statement of Compliance (Aerodynamic
Model): At a minimum, the following must
be addressed in the SOC:
a. Source Data and Modeling Methods: The
SOC must identify the sources of data used
to develop the aerodynamic model. These
data sources may be from the airplane
original equipment manufacturer (OEM),
the original FSTD manufacturer/data provider, or other data provider acceptable to
the FAA. Of particular interest is a mapping of test points in the form of alpha/
beta envelope plot for a minimum of flaps
up and flaps down aircraft configurations.
For the flight test data, a list of the types
of maneuvers used to define the aerodynamic model for angle of attack ranges
greater than the first indication of stall
must be provided per flap setting. In cases
where it is impractical to develop and validate a stall model with flight-test data
(e.g., due to safety concerns involving the
collection of flight test data past a certain
angle of attack), the data provider is expected to make a reasonable attempt to develop a stall model through the required
angle of attack range using analytical
methods and empirical data (e.g., wind-tunnel data);
b. Validity Range: The FSTD sponsor must
declare the range of angle of attack and

181

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:30 Jun 25, 2019

Jkt 247047

PO 00000

Frm 00191

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8002

Q:\14\14V2.TXT

PC31