Pt. 60, App. A

14 CFR Ch. I (1-1-19 Edition)

c. Record  - functional preflight -  in the
FFS discrepancy log book or other acceptable location, including any item found to be
missing, malfunctioning, or inoperative.
d. During the continuing qualification
evaluation conducted by the NSPM, the
sponsor must also provide a person knowledgeable about the operation of the aircraft
and the operation of the FFS.
e. The NSPM will conduct continuing qualification evaluations every 12 months unless:
(1) The NSPM becomes aware of discrepancies or performance problems with the device that warrants more frequent evaluations; or
(2) The sponsor implements a QMS that
justifies less frequent evaluations. However,
in no case shall the frequency of a continuing qualification evaluation exceed 36
months.

ally and should be able to be conducted within approximately one-third (1-3) of the allotted FFS time.
(3) A subjective evaluation of the FFS to
perform a representative sampling of the
tasks set out in attachment 3 of this appendix. This portion of the evaluation should
take approximately two-thirds (2-3) of the allotted FFS time.
(4) An examination of the functions of the
FFS may include the motion system, visual
system, sound system, instructor operating
station, and the normal functions and simulated malfunctions of the airplane systems.
This examination is normally accomplished
simultaneously with the subjective evaluation requirements.

END QPS REQUIREMENTS

15. LOGGING FFS DISCREPANCIES (Section 60.20)

END INFORMATION
lllllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllllll

BEGIN INFORMATION

kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB

BEGIN INFORMATION

No additional regulatory or informational
material applies to Section 60.20. Logging FFS Discrepancies.

f. The sponsor-s test sequence and the content of each quarterly inspection required in
Section 60.19(a)(1) should include a balance and a
mix from the objective test requirement
areas listed as follows:
(1) Performance.
(2) Handling qualities.
(3) Motion system (where appropriate).
(4) Visual system (where appropriate).
(5) Sound system (where appropriate).
(6) Other FFS systems.
g. If the NSP evaluator plans to accomplish specific tests during a normal continuing qualification evaluation that requires the use of special equipment or technicians, the sponsor will be notified as far in
advance of the evaluation as practical; but
not less than 72 hours. Examples of such
tests include latencies, control dynamics,
sounds and vibrations, motion, and/or some
visual system tests.
h. The continuing qualification evaluations, described in Section 60.19(b), will normally require 4 hours of FFS time. However, flexibility is necessary to address abnormal situations or situations involving aircraft with
additional levels of complexity (e.g., computer controlled aircraft). The sponsor
should anticipate that some tests may require additional time. The continuing qualification evaluations will consist of the following:
(1) Review of the results of the quarterly
inspections conducted by the sponsor since
the last scheduled continuing qualification
evaluation.
(2) A selection of approximately 8 to 15 objective tests from the MQTG that provide an
adequate opportunity to evaluate the performance of the FFS. The tests chosen will
be performed either automatically or manu-

END INFORMATION
lllllllllllllllllllllll
16. INTERIM QUALIFICATION OF FFSS FOR NEW
AIRPLANE TYPES OR MODELS (Section 60.21)
lllllllllllllllllllllll
BEGIN INFORMATION
No additional regulatory or informational
material applies to Section 60.21, Interim Qualification of FFSs for New Airplane Types or Models.
END INFORMATION
lllllllllllllllllllllll
17. MODIFICATIONS TO FFSS (Section 60.23)
BEGIN QPS REQUIREMENTS
a. The notification described in Section 60.23(c)(2)
must include a complete description of the
planned modification, with a description of
the operational and engineering effect the
proposed modification will have on the operation of the FFS and the results that are expected with the modification incorporated.
b. Prior to using the modified FFS:
(1) All the applicable objective tests completed with the modification incorporated,
including any necessary updates to the
MQTG (e.g., accomplishment of FSTD Directives) must be acceptable to the NSPM; and
(2) The sponsor must provide the NSPM
with a statement signed by the MR that the
factors listed in Section 60.15(b) are addressed by
the appropriate personnel as described in
that section.

26

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:30 Jun 25, 2019

Jkt 247047

PO 00000

Frm 00036

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8002

Q:\14\14V2.TXT

PC31