background image

365 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

Pt. 60, App. C 

taken when applying the tolerance to small 
overshoots since the significance of such 
overshoots becomes questionable. Only those 
overshoots larger than 5 percent of the total 
initial displacement should be considered 
significant. The residual band, labeled T(A

d

on Figure C2A is 

±

5 percent of the initial dis-

placement amplitude A

d

from the steady 

state value of the oscillation. Only oscilla-
tions outside the residual band are consid-
ered significant. When comparing FFS data 
to helicopter data, the process should begin 
by overlaying or aligning the FFS and heli-
copter steady state values and then com-
paring amplitudes of oscillation peaks, the 
time of the first zero crossing, and individual 
periods of oscillation. The FFS should show 
the same number of significant overshoots to 
within one when compared against the heli-
copter data. The procedure for evaluating 
the response is illustrated in Figure C2A. 

(b) Critically damped and Overdamped Re-

sponse. Due to the nature of critically 
damped and overdamped responses (no over-
shoots), the time to reach 90 percent of the 
steady state (neutral point) value should be 
the same as the helicopter within 

±

10 per-

cent. The simulator response must be criti-
cally damped also. Figure C2B illustrates the 
procedure. 

(c) Special considerations. Control systems 

that exhibit characteristics other than clas-
sical overdamped or underdamped responses 
should meet specified tolerances. In addi-
tion, special consideration should be given to 
ensure that significant trends are main-
tained. 

(2) Tolerances. 
(a) The following summarizes the toler-

ances, ‘‘T’’ for underdamped systems, and 
‘‘n’’ is the sequential period of a full cycle of 
oscillation. See Figure C2A of this attach-
ment for an illustration of the referenced 
measurements. 

T(P

0

) ....................

±

10% of P

0

 

T(P

1

) ....................

±

20% of P

1

 

T(P

2

) ....................

±

30% of P

2

 

T(P

n

) ....................

±

10(n + 1)% of P

n

 

T(A

n

) ....................

±

10% of A

1

±

20% 

of Subsequent 
Peaks 

T(A

d

) ....................

±

5% of A

d

= resid-

ual band 

Significant overshoots. First overshoot 

and 

±

1 subsequent overshoots 

(b) The following tolerance applies to criti-

cally damped and overdamped systems only. 
See Figure C2B for an illustration of the ref-
erence measurements: 

T(P

0

) ....................

±

10% of P

0

 

E

ND

I

NFORMATION

 

lllllllllllllllllllllll

B

EGIN

QPS R

EQUIREMENT

 

c. Alternative method for control dynam-

ics evaluation. 

(1) An alternative means for validating 

control dynamics for aircraft with hydrau-
lically powered flight controls and artificial 
feel systems is by the measurement of con-
trol force and rate of movement. For each 
axis of pitch, roll, and yaw, the control must 
be forced to its maximum extreme position 
for the following distinct rates. These tests 
are conducted under normal flight and 
ground conditions. 

(a) Static test—Slowly move the control so 

that a full sweep is achieved within 95–105 
seconds. A full sweep is defined as movement 
of the controller from neutral to the stop, 
usually aft or right stop, then to the oppo-
site stop, then to the neutral position. 

(b) Slow dynamic test—Achieve a full 

sweep within 8–12 seconds. 

(c) Fast dynamic test—Achieve a full 

sweep in within 3–5 seconds. 

N

OTE

: Dynamic sweeps may be limited to 

forces not exceeding 100 lbs. (44.5 daN). 

(d) Tolerances 
(i) Static test—see Table C2A, FFS Objec-

tive Tests, Entries 2.a.1., 2.a.2., and 2.a.3. 

(ii) Dynamic test—

±

2 lbs (0.9 daN) or 

±

10% 

on dynamic increment above static test. 

E

ND

QPS R

EQUIREMENT

 

lllllllllllllllllllllll

B

EGIN

I

NFORMATION

 

d. The FAA is open to alternative means 

that are justified and appropriate to the ap-
plication. For example, the method described 
here may not apply to all manufacturers sys-
tems and certainly not to aircraft with re-
versible control systems. Each case is con-
sidered on its own merit on an ad hoc basis. 
If the FAA finds that alternative methods do 
not result in satisfactory performance, more 
conventionally accepted methods will have 
to be used. 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

16:30 Jun 25, 2019

Jkt 247047

PO 00000

Frm 00375

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8002

Q:\14\14V2.TXT

PC31

kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB