371
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
Pt. 60, App. C
8. A
DDITIONAL
I
NFORMATION
A
BOUT
F
LIGHT
S
IMULATOR
Q
UALIFICATION FOR
N
EW OR
D
E
-
RIVATIVE
H
ELICOPTERS
a. Typically, a helicopter manufacturer’s
approved final data for performance, han-
dling qualities, systems or avionics is not
available until well after a new or derivative
helicopter has entered service. However,
flight crew training and certification often
begins several months prior to the entry of
the first helicopter into service. Con-
sequently, it may be necessary to use pre-
liminary data provided by the helicopter
manufacturer for interim qualification of
flight simulators.
b. In these cases, the NSPM may accept
certain partially validated preliminary heli-
copter and systems data, and early release
(‘‘red label’’) avionics data in order to permit
the necessary program schedule for training,
certification, and service introduction.
c. Simulator sponsors seeking qualifica-
tion based on preliminary data should con-
sult the NSPM to make special arrange-
ments for using preliminary data for flight
simulator qualification. The sponsor should
also consult the helicopter and flight simu-
lator manufacturers to develop a data plan
and flight simulator qualification plan.
d. The procedure to be followed to gain
NSPM acceptance of preliminary data will
vary from case to case and between heli-
copter manufacturers. Each helicopter man-
ufacturer’s new helicopter development and
test program is designed to suit the needs of
the particular project and may not contain
the same events or sequence of events as an-
other manufacturer’s program or even the
same manufacturer’s program for a different
helicopter. Therefore, there cannot be a pre-
scribed invariable procedure for acceptance
of preliminary data; instead there should be
a statement describing the final sequence of
events, data sources, and validation proce-
dures agreed by the simulator sponsor, the
helicopter manufacturer, the flight simu-
lator manufacturer, and the NSPM.
N
OTE
: A description of helicopter manufac-
turer-provided data needed for flight simu-
lator modeling and validation is to be found
in the ‘‘Royal Aeronautical Society Data
Package Requirements for Design and Per-
formance Evaluation of Rotary Wing Syn-
thetic Training Devices.’’
e. The preliminary data should be the man-
ufacturer’s best representation of the heli-
copter, with assurance that the final data
will not deviate significantly from the pre-
liminary estimates. Data derived from these
predictive or preliminary techniques should
be validated by available sources including,
at least, the following:
(1) Manufacturer’s engineering report. The
report should explain the predictive method
used and illustrate past success of the meth-
od on similar projects. For example, the
manufacturer could show the application of
the method to an earlier helicopter model or
predict the characteristics of an earlier
model and compare the results to final data
for that model.
(2) Early flight test results. This data is
often derived from helicopter certification
tests and should be used to maximum advan-
tage for early flight simulator validation.
Certain critical tests that would normally be
done early in the helicopter certification
program should be included to validate es-
sential pilot training and certification ma-
neuvers. These tests include cases where a
pilot is expected to cope with a helicopter
failure mode or an engine failure. The early
data available will depend on the helicopter
manufacturer’s flight test program design
and may not be the same in each case. The
flight test program of the helicopter manu-
facturer should include provisions for gen-
eration of very early flight tests results for
flight simulator validation.
f. The use of preliminary data is not indefi-
nite. The helicopter manufacturer’s final
data should be available within 12 months
after the helicopter first entry into service
or as agreed by the NSPM, the simulator
sponsor, and the helicopter manufacturer.
When applying for interim qualification
using preliminary data, the simulator spon-
sor and the NSPM should agree on the up-
date program. This includes specifying that
the final data update will be installed in the
flight simulator within a period of 12 months
following the final data release, unless spe-
cial conditions exist and a different schedule
is acceptable. The flight simulator perform-
ance and handling validation would then be
based on data derived from flight tests. Ini-
tial helicopter systems data should be up-
dated after engineering tests. Final heli-
copter systems data should also be used for
flight simulator programming and valida-
tion.
g. Flight simulator avionics should stay
essentially in step with helicopter avionics
(hardware and software) updates. The per-
mitted time lapse between helicopter and
flight simulator updates should be minimal.
It may depend on the magnitude of the up-
date and whether the QTG and pilot training
and certification are affected. Differences in
helicopter and flight simulator avionics
versions and the resulting effects on flight
simulator qualification should be agreed be-
tween the simulator sponsor and the NSPM.
Consultation with the flight simulator man-
ufacturer is desirable throughout the quali-
fication process.
h. The following describes an example of
the design data and sources that might be
used in the development of an interim quali-
fication plan.
(1) The plan should consist of the develop-
ment of a QTG based upon a mix of flight
test and engineering simulation data. For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247047
PO 00000
Frm 00381
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8002
Q:\14\14V2.TXT
PC31
kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB