Previous Page Page 668 Next Page  
background image

659 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 27.573 

limits in § 27.309 (including altitude ef-
fects), except that maneuvering load 
factors need not exceed the maximum 
values expected in service; 

(iii) The loading spectra as severe as 

those expected in service based on 
loads or stresses determined under 
paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, in-
cluding external load operations, if ap-
plicable, and other operations includ-
ing high-torque events; 

(iv) A threat assessment for all PSEs 

that specifies the locations, types, and 
sizes of damage, considering fatigue, 
environmental effects, intrinsic and 
discrete flaws, and impact or other ac-
cidental damage (including the discrete 
source of the accidental damage) that 
may occur during manufacture or oper-
ation; and 

(v) An assessment of the residual 

strength and fatigue characteristics of 
all PSEs that supports the replacement 
times and inspection intervals estab-
lished under paragraph (d)(2) of this 
section. 

(2) Each applicant must establish re-

placement times, inspections, or other 
procedures for all PSEs to require the 
repair or replacement of damaged parts 
before a catastrophic failure. These re-
placement times, inspections, or other 
procedures must be included in the Air-
worthiness Limitations Section of the 
Instructions for Continued Airworthi-
ness required by § 27.1529. 

(i) Replacement times for PSEs must 

be determined by tests, or by analysis 
supported by tests, and must show that 
the structure is able to withstand the 
repeated loads of variable magnitude 
expected in-service. In establishing 
these replacement times, the following 
items must be considered: 

(A) Damage identified in the threat 

assessment required by paragraph 
(d)(1)(iv) of this section; 

(B) Maximum acceptable manufac-

turing defects and in-service damage 
(

i.e., those that do not lower the resid-

ual strength below ultimate design 
loads and those that can be repaired to 
restore ultimate strength); and 

(C) Ultimate load strength capability 

after applying repeated loads. 

(ii) Inspection intervals for PSEs 

must be established to reveal any dam-
age identified in the threat assessment 
required by paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this 

section that may occur from fatigue or 
other in-service causes before such 
damage has grown to the extent that 
the component cannot sustain the re-
quired residual strength capability. In 
establishing these inspection intervals, 
the following items must be consid-
ered: 

(A) The growth rate, including no- 

growth, of the damage under the re-
peated loads expected in-service deter-
mined by tests or analysis supported 
by tests; 

(B) The required residual strength for 

the assumed damage established after 
considering the damage type, inspec-
tion interval, detectability of damage, 
and the techniques adopted for damage 
detection. The minimum required re-
sidual strength is limit load; and 

(C) Whether the inspection will de-

tect the damage growth before the 
minimum residual strength is reached 
and restored to ultimate load capa-
bility, or whether the component will 
require replacement. 

(3) Each applicant must consider the 

effects of damage on stiffness, dynamic 
behavior, loads, and functional per-
formance on all PSEs when substan-
tiating the maximum assumed damage 
size and inspection interval. 

(e) Fatigue Evaluation: If an appli-

cant establishes that the damage toler-
ance evaluation described in paragraph 
(d) of this section is impractical within 
the limits of geometry, inspectability, 
or good design practice, the applicant 
must do a fatigue evaluation of the 
particular composite rotorcraft struc-
ture and: 

(1) Identify all PSEs considered in 

the fatigue evaluation; 

(2) Identify the types of damage for 

all PSEs considered in the fatigue eval-
uation; 

(3) Establish supplemental proce-

dures to minimize the risk of cata-
strophic failure associated with the 
damages identified in paragraph (d) of 
this section; and 

(4) Include these supplemental proce-

dures in the Airworthiness Limitations 
section of the Instructions for Contin-
ued Airworthiness required by § 27.1529. 

[Doc. No. FAA–2009–0660, Amdt. 27–47, 76 FR 
74663, Dec. 1, 2011] 

VerDate Mar<15>2010 

10:12 Mar 18, 2014

Jkt 232046

PO 00000

Frm 00669

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\232046.XXX

232046

pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with CFR

  Previous Page Page 668 Next Page