Previous Page | Page 824 | Next Page |
815
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 29.1419
released outside the rotorcraft must be
attached to the rotorcraft by the static
line prescribed in § 29.1415.
(e)
Long-range signaling device. The
stowage provisions for the long-range
signaling device required by § 29.1415
must be near an exit available during
an unplanned ditching.
(f)
Life preservers. Each life preserver
must be within easy reach of each oc-
cupant while seated.
§ 29.1413
Safety belts: passenger warn-
ing device.
(a) If there are means to indicate to
the passengers when safety belts
should be fastened, they must be in-
stalled to be operated from either pilot
seat.
(b) Each safety belt must be equipped
with a metal to metal latching device.
(Secs. 313, 314, and 601 through 610 of the Fed-
eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354, 1355,
and 1421 through 1430) and sec. 6(c), Dept. of
Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as
amended by Amdt. 29–16 43 FR 46233, Oct. 5,
1978]
§ 29.1415
Ditching equipment.
(a) Emergency flotation and sig-
naling equipment required by any oper-
ating rule of this chapter must meet
the requirements of this section.
(b) Each liferaft and each life pre-
server must be approved. In addition—
(1) Provide not less than two rafts, of
an approximately equal rated capacity
and buoyancy to accommodate the oc-
cupants of the rotorcraft; and
(2) Each raft must have a trailing
line, and must have a static line de-
signed to hold the raft near the rotor-
craft but to release it if the rotorcraft
becomes totally submerged.
(c) Approved survival equipment
must be attached to each liferaft.
(d) There must be an approved sur-
vival type emergency locator trans-
mitter for use in one life raft.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as
amended by Amdt. 29–8, 36 FR 18722, Sept. 21,
1971; Amdt. 29–19, 45 FR 38348, June 9, 1980;
Amdt. 27–26, 55 FR 8005, Mar. 6, 1990; Amdt.
29–33, 59 FR 32057, June 21, 1994]
§ 29.1419
Ice protection.
(a) To obtain certification for flight
into icing conditions, compliance with
this section must be shown.
(b) It must be demonstrated that the
rotorcraft can be safely operated in the
continuous maximum and intermittent
maximum icing conditions determined
under appendix C of this part within
the rotorcraft altitude envelope. An
analysis must be performed to estab-
lish, on the basis of the rotorcraft’s
operational needs, the adequacy of the
ice protection system for the various
components of the rotorcraft.
(c) In addition to the analysis and
physical evaluation prescribed in para-
graph (b) of this section, the effective-
ness of the ice protection system and
its components must be shown by
flight tests of the rotorcraft or its com-
ponents in measured natural atmos-
pheric icing conditions and by one or
more of the following tests as found
necessary to determine the adequacy of
the ice protection system:
(1) Laboratory dry air or simulated
icing tests, or a combination of both, of
the components or models of the com-
ponents.
(2) Flight dry air tests of the ice pro-
tection system as a whole, or its indi-
vidual components.
(3) Flight tests of the rotorcraft or
its components in measured simulated
icing conditions.
(d) The ice protection provisions of
this section are considered to be appli-
cable primarily to the airframe. Power-
plant installation requirements are
contained in Subpart E of this part.
(e) A means must be identified or
provided for determining the formation
of ice on critical parts of the rotor-
craft. Unless otherwise restricted, the
means must be available for nighttime
as well as daytime operation. The
rotorcraft flight manual must describe
the means of determining ice forma-
tion and must contain information nec-
essary for safe operation of the rotor-
craft in icing conditions.
[Amdt. 29–21, 48 FR 4391, Jan. 31, 1983]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
10:12 Mar 18, 2014
Jkt 232046
PO 00000
Frm 00825
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8010
Y:\SGML\232046.XXX
232046
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with CFR
Previous Page | Page 824 | Next Page |