Previous Page Page 152 Next Page  
background image

142 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–14 Edition) 

Pt. 60, App. B 

(2) A continuing qualification evaluation 

requirements page. This page will be used by 
the NSPM to establish and record the fre-
quency with which continuing qualification 
evaluations must be conducted and any sub-
sequent changes that may be determined by 
the NSPM in accordance with § 60.19. See At-
tachment 4, Figure B4G, of this appendix, for 
a sample Continuing Qualification Evalua-
tion Requirements page. 

(3) An FTD information page that provides 

the information listed in this paragraph, if 
applicable (see Attachment 4, Figure B4B, of 
this appendix, for a sample FTD information 
page). For convertible FTDs, the sponsor 
must submit a separate page for each con-
figuration of the FTD. 

(a) The sponsor’s FTD identification num-

ber or code. 

(b) The airplane model and series being 

simulated. 

(c) The aerodynamic data revision number 

or reference. 

(d) The source of the basic aerodynamic 

model and the aerodynamic coefficient data 
used to modify the basic model. 

(e) The engine model(s) and its data revi-

sion number or reference. 

(f) The flight control data revision number 

or reference. 

(g) The flight management system identi-

fication and revision level. 

(h) The FTD model and manufacturer. 
(i) The date of FTD manufacture. 
(j) The FTD computer identification. 
(k) The visual system model and manufac-

turer, including display type. 

(l) The motion system type and manufac-

turer, including degrees of freedom. 

(4) A Table of Contents. 
(5) A log of revisions and a list of effective 

pages. 

(6) List of all relevant data references. 
(7) A glossary of terms and symbols used 

(including sign conventions and units). 

(8) Statements of compliance and capa-

bility (SOCs) with certain requirements. 

(9) Recording procedures or equipment re-

quired to accomplish the objective tests. 

(10) The following information for each ob-

jective test designated in Attachment 2 of 
this appendix, as applicable to the qualifica-
tion level sought: 

(a) Name of the test. 
(b) Objective of the test. 
(c) Initial conditions. 
(d) Manual test procedures. 
(e) Automatic test procedures (if applica-

ble). 

(f) Method for evaluating FTD objective 

test results. 

(g) List of all relevant parameters driven 

or constrained during the automatic test(s). 

(h) List of all relevant parameters driven 

or constrained during the manual test(s). 

(i) Tolerances for relevant parameters. 

(j) Source of Validation Data (document 

and page number). 

(k) Copy of the Validation Data (if located 

in a separate binder, a cross reference for the 
identification and page number for pertinent 
data location must be provided). 

(l) FTD Objective Test Results as obtained 

by the sponsor. Each test result must reflect 
the date completed and must be clearly la-
beled as a product of the device being tested. 

f. A convertible FTD is addressed as a sepa-

rate FTD for each model and series airplane 
to which it will be converted and for the 
FAA qualification level sought. The NSPM 
will conduct an evaluation for each configu-
ration. If a sponsor seeks qualification for 
two or more models of an airplane type using 
a convertible FTD, the sponsor must provide 
a QTG for each airplane model, or a QTG for 
the first airplane model and a supplement to 
that QTG for each additional airplane model. 
The NSPM will conduct evaluations for each 
airplane model. 

g. The form and manner of presentation of 

objective test results in the QTG must in-
clude the following: 

(1) The sponsor’s FTD test results must be 

recorded in a manner acceptable to the 
NSPM, that allows easy comparison of the 
FTD test results to the validation data (e.g., 
use of a multi-channel recorder, line printer, 
cross plotting, overlays, transparencies). 

(2) FTD results must be labeled using ter-

minology common to airplane parameters as 
opposed to computer software identifica-
tions. 

(3) Validation data documents included in 

a QTG may be photographically reduced only 
if such reduction will not alter the graphic 
scaling or cause difficulties in scale interpre-
tation or resolution. 

(4) Scaling on graphical presentations 

must provide the resolution necessary to 
evaluate the parameters shown in Attach-
ment 2, Table B2A of this appendix. 

(5) Tests involving time histories, data 

sheets (or transparencies thereof) and FTD 
test results must be clearly marked with ap-
propriate reference points to ensure an accu-
rate comparison between FTD and airplane 
with respect to time. Time histories recorded 
via a line printer are to be clearly identified 
for cross-plotting on the airplane data. Over- 
plots may not obscure the reference data. 

h. The sponsor may elect to complete the 

QTG objective and subjective tests at the 
manufacturer’s facility or at the sponsor’s 
training facility. If the tests are conducted 
at the manufacturer’s facility, the sponsor 
must repeat at least one-third of the tests at 
the sponsor’s training facility in order to 
substantiate FTD performance. The QTG 
must be clearly annotated to indicate when 
and where each test was accomplished. Tests 
conducted at the manufacturer’s facility and 
at the sponsor’s training facility must be 
conducted after the FTD is assembled with 

VerDate Mar<15>2010 

20:48 Jan 30, 2014

Jkt 232047

PO 00000

Frm 00152

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8002

Q:\14\14V2.TXT

ofr150

PsN: PC150

  Previous Page Page 152 Next Page