Previous Page Page 183 Next Page  
background image

173 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

Pt. 60, App. B 

T

ABLE

B2E—A

LTERNATIVE

D

ATA

S

OURCE FOR

FTD L

EVEL

5 M

ULTI

-E

NGINE

(T

URBO

-P

ROPELLER

A

IRPLANE

—Continued 

QPS Requirement 

The performance parameters in this table must be used to program the FTD if flight test data is not used to program the FTD. 

Applicable test 

Authorized performance range 

Entry No. 

Title and procedure 

2.c.8.b. .......

Phugoid dynamics ...........................................................

Must have a phugoid with a period of 30–60 seconds. 

May not reach 

1

2

or double amplitude in less than 2 

cycles. 

2.d. .............

Lateral Directional Tests 

2.d.2. ..........

Roll response ..................................................................
Roll rate must be measured through at least 30

° 

of roll. 

Aileron control must be deflected 

1

3

(33.3 percent) of 

maximum travel. 

Must have a roll rate of 4–25 degrees/second. 

2.d.4.b. .......

Spiral stability ..................................................................
Cruise configuration and normal cruise airspeed. Estab-

lish a 20

°

–30

° 

bank. When stabilized, neutralize the 

aileron control and release. Must be completed in 
both directions of turn. 

Initial bank angle (

±

5

°

) after 20 seconds. 

2.d.6.b. .......

Rudder response .............................................................
Use 25 percent of maximum rudder deflection. (Appli-

cable to approach or landing configuration.) 

3

°

–6

° 

/second yaw rate. 

2.d.7. ..........

Dutch roll, yaw damper off ..............................................
(Applicable to cruise and approach configurations.) 

A period of 2–5 seconds; and 

1

2

–2 cycles. 

2.d.8. ..........

Steady state sideslip .......................................................
Use 50 percent rudder deflection. (Applicable to ap-

proach and landing configurations.) 

2

°

–10

° 

of bank; 

4

°

–10

° 

of sideslip; and 

2

°

–10

° 

of aileron. 

6. FTD System Response Time 

6.a. .............

Flight deck instrument systems response to an abrupt 

pilot controller input. One test is required in each axis 
(pitch, roll, yaw).

300 milliseconds or less. 

E

ND

QPS R

EQUIREMENTS

 

lllllllllllllllllllllll

B

EGIN

QPS R

EQUIREMENTS

 

5. A

LTERNATIVE

D

ATA

S

OURCES

, P

ROCEDURES

AND

I

NSTRUMENTATION

: L

EVEL

6 FTD O

NLY

 

a. Sponsors are not required to use the al-

ternative data sources, procedures, and in-
strumentation. However, a sponsor may 
choose to use one or more of the alternative 
sources, procedures, and instrumentation de-
scribed in Table B2F. 

E

ND

QPS R

EQUIREMENTS

 

lllllllllllllllllllllll

B

EGIN

I

NFORMATION

 

b. It has become standard practice for ex-

perienced FTD manufacturers to use such 
techniques as a means of establishing data 
bases for new FTD configurations while 
awaiting the availability of actual flight test 
data; and then comparing this new data with 
the newly available flight test data. The re-

sults of such comparisons have, as reported 
by some recognized and experienced simula-
tion experts, become increasingly consistent 
and indicate that these techniques, applied 
with appropriate experience, are becoming 
dependably accurate for the development of 
aerodynamic models for use in Level 6 FTDs. 

c. In reviewing this history, the NSPM has 

concluded that, with proper care, those who 
are experienced in the development of aero-
dynamic models for FTD application can 
successfully use these modeling techniques 
to acceptably alter the method by which 
flight test data may be acquired and, when 
applied to Level 6 FTDs, does not com-
promise the quality of that simulation. 

d. The information in the table that fol-

lows (Table of Alternative Data Sources, 
Procedures, and Information: Level 6 FTD 
Only) is presented to describe an acceptable 
alternative to data sources for Level 6 FTD 
modeling and validation, and an acceptable 
alternative to the procedures and instrumen-
tation found in the flight test methods tradi-
tionally accepted for gathering modeling and 
validation data. 

VerDate Mar<15>2010 

20:48 Jan 30, 2014

Jkt 232047

PO 00000

Frm 00183

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8002

Q:\14\14V2.TXT

ofr150

PsN: PC150

  Previous Page Page 183 Next Page