Previous Page | Page 32 | Next Page |
22
14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–14 Edition)
Pt. 60, App. A
(f) The flight control data revision number
or reference.
(g) The flight management system identi-
fication and revision level.
(h) The FFS model and manufacturer.
(i) The date of FFS manufacture.
(j) The FFS computer identification.
(k) The visual system model and manufac-
turer, including display type.
(l) The motion system type and manufac-
turer, including degrees of freedom.
(4) A Table of Contents.
(5) A log of revisions and a list of effective
pages.
(6) A list of all relevant data references.
(7) A glossary of terms and symbols used
(including sign conventions and units).
(8) Statements of Compliance and Capa-
bility (SOCs) with certain requirements.
(9) Recording procedures or equipment re-
quired to accomplish the objective tests.
(10) The following information for each ob-
jective test designated in Attachment 2,
Table A2A, of this appendix as applicable to
the qualification level sought:
(a) Name of the test.
(b) Objective of the test.
(c) Initial conditions.
(d) Manual test procedures.
(e) Automatic test procedures (if applica-
ble).
(f) Method for evaluating FFS objective
test results.
(g) List of all relevant parameters driven
or constrained during the automatically con-
ducted test(s).
(h) List of all relevant parameters driven
or constrained during the manually con-
ducted test(s).
(i) Tolerances for relevant parameters.
(j) Source of Validation Data (document
and page number).
(k) Copy of the Validation Data (if located
in a separate binder, a cross reference for the
identification and page number for pertinent
data location must be provided).
(l) Simulator Objective Test Results as ob-
tained by the sponsor. Each test result must
reflect the date completed and must be
clearly labeled as a product of the device
being tested.
f. A convertible FFS is addressed as a sepa-
rate FFS for each model and series airplane
to which it will be converted and for the
FAA qualification level sought. If a sponsor
seeks qualification for two or more models of
an airplane type using a convertible FFS,
the sponsor must submit a QTG for each air-
plane model, or a QTG for the first airplane
model and a supplement to that QTG for
each additional airplane model. The NSPM
will conduct evaluations for each airplane
model.
g. Form and manner of presentation of ob-
jective test results in the QTG:
(1) The sponsor’s FFS test results must be
recorded in a manner acceptable to the
NSPM, that allows easy comparison of the
FFS test results to the validation data (e.g.,
use of a multi-channel recorder, line printer,
cross plotting, overlays, transparencies).
(2) FFS results must be labeled using ter-
minology common to airplane parameters as
opposed to computer software identifica-
tions.
(3) Validation data documents included in
a QTG may be photographically reduced only
if such reduction will not alter the graphic
scaling or cause difficulties in scale interpre-
tation or resolution.
(4) Scaling on graphical presentations
must provide the resolution necessary to
evaluate the parameters shown in Attach-
ment 2, Table A2A of this appendix.
(5) Tests involving time histories, data
sheets (or transparencies thereof) and FFS
test results must be clearly marked with ap-
propriate reference points to ensure an accu-
rate comparison between the FFS and the
airplane with respect to time. Time histories
recorded via a line printer are to be clearly
identified for cross plotting on the airplane
data. Over-plots must not obscure the ref-
erence data.
h. The sponsor may elect to complete the
QTG objective and subjective tests at the
manufacturer’s facility or at the sponsor’s
training facility. If the tests are conducted
at the manufacturer’s facility, the sponsor
must repeat at least one-third of the tests at
the sponsor’s training facility in order to
substantiate FFS performance. The QTG
must be clearly annotated to indicate when
and where each test was accomplished. Tests
conducted at the manufacturer’s facility and
at the sponsor’s training facility must be
conducted after the FFS is assembled with
systems and sub-systems functional and op-
erating in an interactive manner. The test
results must be submitted to the NSPM.
i. The sponsor must maintain a copy of the
MQTG at the FFS location.
j. All FFSs for which the initial qualifica-
tion is conducted after May 30, 2014, must
have an electronic MQTG (eMQTG) including
all objective data obtained from airplane
testing, or another approved source (refor-
matted or digitized), together with corre-
lating objective test results obtained from
the performance of the FFS (reformatted or
digitized) as prescribed in this appendix. The
eMQTG must also contain the general FFS
performance or demonstration results (refor-
matted or digitized) prescribed in this appen-
dix, and a description of the equipment nec-
essary to perform the initial qualification
evaluation and the continuing qualification
evaluations. The eMQTG must include the
original validation data used to validate
FFS performance and handling qualities in
either the original digitized format from the
data supplier or an electronic scan of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:48 Jan 30, 2014
Jkt 232047
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8002
Q:\14\14V2.TXT
ofr150
PsN: PC150
Previous Page | Page 32 | Next Page |