Previous Page Page 169 Next Page  
background image

159 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

Pt. 60, App. B 

2.a.2.b.

.....

Roll Controller Position vs. 

Force.

±

2 lb (0.9 daN) breakout, 

±

10% or 

±

3 lb (1.3 daN) 

force.

As 

determined 

by 

sponsor

..

Record results during initial qualification 

evaluation for an uninterrupted control 

sweep to the stops. The recorded toler-

ances apply to subsequent comparisons 

on continuing qualification evaluations.

Applicable only on con-

tinuing qualification eval-

uations. The intent is to 

design the control feel for 

Level 5 to be able to 

manually fly an instru-

ment approach; and not 

to compare results to 

flight test or other such 

data. 

2.a.3.a.

.....

Rudder Pedal Position vs. 

Force and Surface Posi-

tion Calibration.

±

5 lb (2.2 daN) breakout, 

±

10% or 

±

5 lb (2.2 daN) 

force, 

±

2

° 

rudder angle.

Ground

................................

Record results for an uninterrupted control 

sweep to the stops.

2.a.3.b.

.....

Rudder Pedal Position vs. 

Force.

±

5 lb (2.2 daN) breakout, 

±

10% or 

±

5 lb (2.2 daN) 

force.

As 

determined 

by 

sponsor

..

Record results during initial qualification 

evaluation for an uninterrupted control 

sweep to the stops. The recorded toler-

ances apply to subsequent comparisons 

on continuing qualification evaluations.

Applicable only on con-

tinuing qualification eval-

uations. The intent is to 

design the control feel for 

Level 5 to be able to 

manually fly an instru-

ment approach; and not 

to compare results to 

flight test or other such 

data. 

2.a.4.

........

Nosewheel Steering Con-

troller Force.

±

2 lb (0.9 daN) breakout, 

±

10% or 

±

3 lb (1.3 daN) 

force.

Ground

................................

Record results of an uninterrupted control 

sweep to the stops.

2.a.5.

........

Rudder Pedal Steering Cali-

bration.

±

2

° 

nosewheel 

angle

..........

Ground

................................

Record results of an uninterrupted control 

sweep to the stops.

2.a.6.

........

Pitch Trim Indicator vs. Sur-

face Position Calibration.

±

0.5

° 

of computed trim sur-

face angle.

Ground

................................

The purpose of the test is to 

compare the FTD against 

design data or equivalent. 

2.a.7.

........

(Reserved) 

2.a.8.

........

Alignment of Flight deck 

Throttle Lever vs. Se-

lected Engine Parameter.

±

5

° 

of throttle lever angle or 

±

0.8 in (2 cm) for power 

control without angular 

travel, or 

±

3% N1, or 

±

0.03 EPR, or 

±

3% max-

imum rated manifold 

pressure, or 

±

3% torque.

Ground

................................

Requires simultaneous recording for all 

engines. The tolerances apply against 

airplane data and between engines. In 

the case of propeller powered airplanes, 

if a propeller lever is present, it must 

also be checked. For airplanes with 

throttle ‘‘detents,’’ all detents must be 

presented. May be a series of snapshot 

test results.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 

20:48 Jan 30, 2014

Jkt 232047

PO 00000

Frm 00169

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8002

Q:\14\14V2.TXT

ofr150

PsN: PC150

  Previous Page Page 169 Next Page